Memory, self-examination, and time › A confession addressed to someone
PhilosophyAll chapters Reading tools Notes & comments
Memory, self-examination, and time › A confession addressed to someoneSection view · Sections in this chapter1 / 10 ↓
Imagine trying to explain how long a familiar song lasts. You hear only a small part of it at a time. The opening has already disappeared, and the ending has yet to arrive. Yet you can recognize the song, anticipate its next phrase, and compare its duration with another performance. How do events that are no longer present, or not yet present, belong to one experience?
Augustine develops this difficulty in Book XI of the Confessions. His example is reciting a psalm, and his question concerns the relation between time and the mind that measures it. The discussion grows out of a work addressed to God, in which remembering a particular life becomes an inquiry into desire, self-knowledge, and the limits of understanding. Reading its account of time apart from that setting can make an exploratory argument look like a finished psychological theory.
The Confessions speaks to God while allowing other people to listen. In Book X, Augustine asks what readers can learn from hearing his account when they cannot inspect his conscience directly. He distinguishes the God who knows him from the people who have to decide whether to trust his words (X.3). The form therefore raises a philosophical problem before it supplies an answer: how can an inward life become known through an outward account?
Confession here includes acknowledging wrongdoing and praising God. Augustine's opening presents the human heart as restless until it rests in God (I.1). That orientation governs the narrative. He assesses earlier pleasures and ambitions from the standpoint of a changed understanding of what deserves love. His present convictions help select and interpret the events he remembers.
This makes the book different from a neutral record of everything that happened. It also prevents us from treating its retrospective explanations as a transparent view into the younger Augustine's mind. The narrator is explaining his earlier life through commitments he now holds. We can examine the explanation while asking whether another interpretation of an episode is possible.
Calling the work philosophical autobiography names this combination of personal narrative and inquiry. It does not mean that Augustine invented reflection on the self or that earlier writers lacked inward lives. The interesting question is how the book uses a life to investigate problems that exceed that life: why someone desires wrongdoing, how a will can oppose itself, and how memory makes absent experiences available to thought.
Comments
Add to the conversation
A question, a correction, or an example from your own work.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!