Action without forcing › A quieter ruler can still be a ruler

Michael BrenndoerferOctober 23, 20262 min read
PhilosophyAll chapters
Part 1 of 12The Good Life
Chapter 7Action without forcing › A quieter ruler can still be a ruler
Reading section 7 of 9 · A quieter ruler can still be a ruler · 2 minSection 7 of 9 · 2 min

Book contents

Section 7 of 9 · 2 min read

Action without forcing › A quieter ruler can still be a rulerOne section · Sections in this chapter7 / 9 ↓
Track your reading progress

Sign in to mark sections as read and track your learning journey

Sign in →

Government is a central test of these ideas. Chapter 57 associates multiplying prohibitions with poverty and proliferating laws with thieves and robbers. Chapter 17 describes the best ruler in terms of the people's ability to experience an accomplishment as their own. These passages challenge government that confuses conspicuous activity with benefit. They also shift attention toward what a ruler's conduct allows others to accomplish. Daodejing, chapters 17 and 57.

This criticism cannot be turned directly into a complete modern program of deregulation. A harmful prohibition and a protection against exploitation are both rules. Removing either reduces the number of rules, but their effects can differ. The text gives reasons to distrust burdensome control; it does not establish that every institution works better when every restriction disappears. Assessing a particular law requires judgments its compressed political sayings do not settle.

Its opposition to military glory is more definite. Chapters 30–31 criticize domination through arms and describe victory as an occasion for mourning. They nevertheless allow military action under necessity. The distinction matters: reluctance to use violence is not an assurance that conflict can always be escaped. A political reading must confront the difficult judgment about necessity rather than use peaceful imagery to avoid it. Daodejing, chapters 30–31.

There is also an unsettling paternalism. Chapter 3 describes a ruler filling bellies while emptying minds and weakening ambitions. Chapter 65 opposes governing through a certain kind of cleverness or knowledge. A sympathetic interpretation sees attacks on competitive cunning and elite schemes that generate disorder. A less sympathetic interpretation sees subjects denied intellectual independence for the convenience of government. The wording leaves a serious problem for readers who value public education and political participation. Daodejing, chapters 3 and 65.

Chapter 80 sharpens that problem through its picture of small communities satisfied with local life, using neither available transport nor weapons and avoiding interchange with neighbors. This can be read as relief from expansionist ambition and exhausting competition. It can also look like a closure of possibilities people might reasonably want. A peaceful population is not necessarily a population able to choose its way of life. The book does not provide a clear institutional guarantee of that choice. Daodejing, chapter 80.

Track your reading progress

Sign in to mark sections as read and track your learning journey

Sign in →

Comments

Add to the conversation

A question, a correction, or an example from your own work.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Newsletter

Stay up to date

Get new articles, book updates, and notes on AI and technology.

Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy policy