Natural theology and natural law › How to read a disputed article
PhilosophyAll chapters Reading tools Notes & comments
Natural theology and natural law › How to read a disputed articleSection view · Sections in this chapter1 / 12 ↓
Suppose someone asks whether a law can be properly enacted and still be unjust. That question distinguishes the existence of a rule from the reasons for obeying it. Aquinas develops an account of law in which human enactment must be assessed against a rational standard of the good. Elsewhere in the same work, he asks whether reason can establish that God exists. Both inquiries concern what reason can discover, but they require different arguments.
The Summa Theologica, also called the Summa Theologiae, treats these questions within a larger theological project. Its opening questions investigate sacred teaching and the existence and nature of God. The discussion of law appears much later, in the First Part of the Second Part. Reading the Five Ways and natural law together helps explain how Aquinas connects reasoning about created things with reasoning about human conduct, without collapsing ethics into a single proof of God.
A typical article first presents objections to the position Aquinas will defend. A short opposing statement follows, then his own answer and replies to the objections. The sequence matters because an opening objection can contain a proposition that the final answer rejects. Quoting an objection as Aquinas's settled view reverses the purpose of the format.
Part I, question 2, illustrates the method. Its first article asks whether God's existence is self-evident. An objection proposes a route from understanding the word God to recognizing real existence. Aquinas's reply challenges that route: understanding what a word signifies does not establish that its subject exists outside the mind (I q.2 a.1, reply 2).
His own answer distinguishes what is self-evident in itself from what is self-evident to us. Because we do not know the divine essence, he argues, we must proceed from effects more familiar to us. This describes the direction of the proposed inquiry. It does not treat the conclusion as obvious to anyone who understands the vocabulary.
Article 2 then distinguishes demonstration from a cause from demonstration through an effect. Aquinas argues that an effect can establish that its cause exists even when it does not supply a complete understanding of that cause. He applies this claim to natural knowledge of God. The Five Ways in article 3 are intended to implement reasoning from effects.
Comments
Add to the conversation
A question, a correction, or an example from your own work.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!