Belief, uncertainty, and commitment › Reading a book of fragments
PhilosophyAll chapters Reading tools Notes & comments
Belief, uncertainty, and commitment › Reading a book of fragmentsSection view · Sections in this chapter2 / 11 ↓
The Pensées is an unfinished collection of materials for a defense of Christianity. Its fragmentary form matters. A note can compress a claim that would need considerable explanation in a finished argument; neighboring fragments do not necessarily supply the sequence Pascal would ultimately have chosen. A reader should be cautious about treating the collection as a completed deductive system.
References here use the numbered fragments in the English text available through Project Gutenberg. In this numbering, the extended Wager discussion is fragment 233, the main discussion of diversion is 139, and the thinking reed appears in 347. When using another edition, check its numbering before following a cross-reference. Looking for a phrase as well as a number helps locate the same passage.
Pascal is arguing for Christianity rather than conducting a neutral comparison of every possible religion. His account of human misery and greatness belongs to that apologetic project. We can examine whether its observations are persuasive without accepting in advance the Christian explanation he offers for them. Agreement about human restlessness would be a starting point for his case, rather than proof of its theological conclusion.
Comments
Add to the conversation
A question, a correction, or an example from your own work.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!