Learn how multiple AI agents collaborate through specialization, parallel processing, and coordination. Explore cooperation patterns including sequential handoff, iterative refinement, and consensus building, plus real frameworks like Google's A2A Protocol.

This article is part of the free-to-read AI Agent Handbook
Agents Working Together
Throughout this handbook, you've built a capable personal assistant that can reason, use tools, remember information, maintain state, interact with its environment, and even make plans. But what if instead of one agent doing everything, you had multiple agents working together, each specializing in what it does best?
Think about how humans collaborate. When you're planning a vacation, you might ask a travel expert for destination recommendations, a financial advisor about budgeting, and a local guide for insider tips. Each person brings specialized knowledge, and together they help you plan better than any single person could alone. AI agents can work the same way.
In this chapter, we'll explore what it means for multiple AI agents to cooperate. You'll see how agents can divide work, share information, and coordinate their actions to solve problems more effectively than a single agent working alone. We'll start with the fundamental concept of cooperation, then look at practical ways agents can work together, and finally examine real frameworks that make multi-agent collaboration possible.
Why Multiple Agents?
Before diving into how agents cooperate, let's understand why you'd want multiple agents in the first place. Our personal assistant has grown quite capable, but there are scenarios where a team of specialized agents makes more sense than one generalist.
Specialization Creates Expertise
Imagine you ask your assistant: "Research the best laptop for video editing under $2000, check if it's in stock locally, and schedule a time for me to visit the store."
This single request involves three distinct capabilities:
- Research Agent: Needs deep knowledge of hardware specs, performance benchmarks, and current market prices
- Inventory Agent: Must check real-time stock across multiple stores and compare availability
- Scheduling Agent: Requires access to your calendar and the store's hours
You could build one agent that does all three, but each capability requires different tools, different knowledge, and different reasoning approaches. A research agent benefits from access to product reviews and technical specifications. An inventory agent needs real-time connections to retail systems. A scheduling agent works best with calendar APIs and time-zone handling.
By splitting these into separate agents, each can be optimized for its specific task. The research agent can use specialized prompts that encourage detailed technical analysis. The inventory agent can handle API rate limits and retries without affecting the others. The scheduling agent can manage complex calendar logic independently.
Parallel Processing
When agents work together, they can tackle multiple tasks simultaneously. While one agent researches laptops, another could be checking your calendar availability, and a third could be looking up store locations. This parallelism makes the overall task complete faster than if a single agent had to do everything sequentially.
Robustness Through Redundancy
Multiple agents can also provide checks and balances. One agent might generate a recommendation, while another reviews it for accuracy or potential issues. This is similar to how software teams have code reviewers, or how important decisions often involve multiple people.
Let's see a simple example of how this might work in practice.
A Simple Collaboration Scenario
Let's extend our personal assistant with a basic multi-agent setup. We'll create two specialized agents:
- User Interface Agent: Handles all interaction with you, understanding your requests and presenting results
- Task Execution Agent: Works in the background on complex tasks that might take time
Here's how they might collaborate on a research request:
Let's unpack what's happening here. When you make a request, the UI agent receives it first. This agent is optimized for conversation. It knows how to interpret your intent and communicate clearly. If the request requires deep work (research, analysis, complex calculations), the UI agent delegates to the task agent.
The task agent doesn't worry about being conversational. It focuses purely on executing the task accurately and thoroughly. Once it completes the work, it returns structured results to the UI agent, which then presents them to you in a friendly, understandable way.
This division of labor has several benefits:
- The UI agent stays responsive: It can immediately acknowledge your request rather than going silent while processing
- The task agent can take its time: It can use longer reasoning chains or multiple tool calls without worrying about keeping you engaged
- Each agent has a clear purpose: The UI agent optimizes for communication; the task agent optimizes for accuracy
Patterns of Cooperation
Now that you've seen a basic example, let's explore different ways agents can work together. These patterns emerge repeatedly in multi-agent systems.
Sequential Handoff
The simplest pattern is a relay race: Agent A completes its part, then hands off to Agent B, which does its part, then hands off to Agent C.
Our example above used this pattern. The UI agent received the request, handed it to the task agent, then received the results back to present to you.
This pattern works well when tasks have clear stages that must happen in order. For instance:
- Planning Agent: Breaks down "plan my weekend" into specific tasks
- Booking Agent: Handles reservations and purchases
- Confirmation Agent: Verifies everything is set and sends you a summary
Each agent specializes in one stage of the pipeline.
Parallel Execution
When tasks are independent, agents can work simultaneously:
Imagine you ask: "What's the best time to launch our product based on market trends and our budget constraints?"
- Market Research Agent: Analyzes industry trends, competitor launches, seasonal patterns
- Financial Agent: Calculates budget implications, revenue projections, cost analysis
Both agents can work simultaneously because they're analyzing different aspects. Once both complete, a coordinator agent combines their insights into a single recommendation.
Iterative Refinement
Sometimes agents work in cycles, each improving on the previous agent's output:
This is like having a writer and an editor collaborate. The draft agent generates content, the review agent suggests improvements, the draft agent incorporates feedback, and the cycle continues until the output meets quality standards.
Here's a simple example:
This pattern is powerful for tasks where quality matters more than speed. The review agent can catch errors, suggest improvements, or ensure the output meets specific criteria, while the draft agent focuses on generation.
Consensus Building
When you need a reliable answer, multiple agents can independently solve the same problem, then vote or discuss to reach consensus:
This is particularly useful for critical decisions or when you want to reduce the chance of errors. If three out of four agents agree on an answer, you can be more confident it's correct.
Real-World Multi-Agent Frameworks
The patterns we've discussed are useful concepts, but implementing multi-agent systems from scratch can be complex. Fortunately, several frameworks have emerged to make this easier. Let's look at some of the most important ones.
The Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol
One of the most significant developments in multi-agent systems is the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol, developed by Google as an open standard. Think of A2A as a common language that allows different AI agents to discover each other, understand what each can do, and work together, even if they were built by different teams using different technologies.
The key innovation of A2A is the concept of Agent Cards. Just as a business card tells you what someone does and how to contact them, an Agent Card describes an agent's capabilities, what inputs it accepts, what outputs it produces, and how other agents can communicate with it.
Here's what an Agent Card might look like conceptually:
With A2A, when your personal assistant needs research help, it can:
- Discover available research agents by querying an agent registry
- Understand what each agent can do by reading their Agent Cards
- Communicate with the chosen agent using the standardized protocol
- Receive results in a predictable format
This standardization is crucial because it means agents from different organizations, built with different frameworks, can still work together. Your assistant built with Anthropic's Claude could seamlessly collaborate with a specialized research agent built with OpenAI's GPT-5 or a data analysis agent built with Google's Gemini.
The A2A protocol also handles important practical concerns:
- Security: Supports standard authentication and encrypted communication
- Task Management: Provides structures for defining, tracking, and completing collaborative tasks
- Modality Support: Works with text, audio, video, and other data types
Other Collaboration Frameworks
While A2A focuses on agent-to-agent communication, other frameworks address different aspects of multi-agent systems:
Model Context Protocol (MCP): Developed by Anthropic, MCP focuses on connecting agents with tools and data sources. While A2A helps agents talk to each other, MCP helps agents access the resources they need. In practice, you might use both: MCP to give your agents access to databases and APIs, and A2A to let those agents coordinate with each other.
Agent Development Kit (ADK): Google's ADK is a toolkit for building agents. Think of it this way: ADK helps you build individual agents, while A2A helps those agents communicate. They're complementary. ADK is the construction tool, A2A is the communication protocol.
LangGraph: A framework for building stateful, multi-agent applications with explicit control flow. LangGraph excels at defining complex workflows where agents need to maintain state and follow specific patterns of interaction.
Bringing It Together: A Multi-Agent Example
Let's build a more sophisticated example that demonstrates several cooperation patterns working together. We'll create a small team of agents that helps you plan a dinner party:
This example demonstrates several key concepts:
Specialization: Each agent has a specific role and expertise. The guest agent knows about dietary restrictions, the menu agent understands recipes and cooking, the shopping agent organizes grocery lists.
Sequential Dependencies: The menu agent needs information from the guest agent (dietary restrictions) before it can plan effectively. The shopping agent needs the menu before it can create a list. This is a natural workflow where each step builds on the previous one.
Coordination: The coordinator agent orchestrates the entire process, breaking down the complex request into manageable tasks and ensuring information flows between specialists.
Information Sharing: Agents pass relevant information to each other. The guest agent's output becomes input for the menu agent, whose output feeds the shopping agent.
When to Use Multiple Agents
Multi-agent systems are powerful, but they're not always the right choice. Here's how to decide:
Use multiple agents when:
- Tasks have distinct, separable concerns (research vs. writing vs. editing)
- Different parts need different tools or knowledge bases
- You want parallel processing for speed
- You need checks and balances (one agent generates, another reviews)
- You're building a system that will grow and need new capabilities over time
Stick with a single agent when:
- The task is straightforward and doesn't benefit from specialization
- Coordination overhead would outweigh the benefits
- You need the simplest possible solution
- The task requires maintaining context that would be hard to share between agents
Think of it like deciding whether to work alone or form a team. For writing a quick email, you work alone. For producing a documentary, you need a team with different skills.
Looking Ahead
You now understand the fundamental concept of agents working together: multiple specialized agents can collaborate through various patterns (sequential, parallel, iterative, consensus) to solve problems more effectively than a single agent.
In the next chapter, we'll dive deeper into how agents communicate with each other. You'll learn about message formats, protocols, and techniques for ensuring agents understand each other correctly. Then we'll explore the benefits and challenges of multi-agent systems in more detail, including how to handle coordination failures and optimize team performance.
The key takeaway is this: just as human teams accomplish more than individuals working alone, AI agent teams can tackle more complex problems by dividing work according to each agent's strengths. The art is in designing the right team structure and communication patterns for your specific needs.
Glossary
Agent Card: A standardized description of an agent's capabilities, inputs, outputs, and communication methods, similar to a business card for AI agents. Used in protocols like A2A to enable agent discovery and interoperability.
Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol: An open standard developed by Google that enables AI agents from different platforms and frameworks to discover each other, understand capabilities, and collaborate through standardized communication.
Consensus Building: A cooperation pattern where multiple agents independently solve the same problem and then compare results to reach agreement, improving reliability and reducing errors.
Coordinator Agent: An agent responsible for orchestrating multi-agent workflows by breaking down complex requests, delegating tasks to specialist agents, and combining results.
Iterative Refinement: A cooperation pattern where agents work in cycles, with one agent generating output and another reviewing and providing feedback, repeating until quality standards are met.
Model Context Protocol (MCP): A framework developed by Anthropic for connecting agents with tools and data sources, complementary to agent-to-agent communication protocols.
Multi-Agent System: A system where multiple AI agents work together, each with specialized capabilities, to accomplish tasks that would be difficult or impossible for a single agent.
Parallel Execution: A cooperation pattern where multiple agents work simultaneously on independent tasks, then combine their results, enabling faster completion of complex requests.
Sequential Handoff: A cooperation pattern where agents work in sequence, with each agent completing its specialized task before passing results to the next agent in the workflow.
Specialization: The practice of designing agents with focused expertise in specific domains or tasks, rather than trying to make one agent handle everything.
Quiz
Ready to test your understanding? Take this quick quiz to reinforce what you've learned about multi-agent systems and how AI agents work together.






Comments