Autoregressive Token World Models › Applications and Results
World Models HandbookAll chapters Autoregressive Token World Models › Applications and ResultsOne section · Sections in this chapter8 / 11 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links
Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.
Article links
Make inline references clickable
Categorical sequence world models and related interactive generators illustrate three distinct possibilities: sample-efficient control, generative interaction, and shared multimodal processing. Their results should be compared on their actual architectures and evaluations.
IRIS combines a learned visual autoencoder, a GPT-style dynamics predictor, and an actor-critic. It reports strong Atari 100k aggregate results among approaches without lookahead search; search-based comparisons differ. This demonstrates a useful categorical world-model recipe, not a proof that token loss counts cause sample efficiency. Recurrent decoders also supervise many quantities, so such a causal comparison would need matched information, objectives, and compute.
Genie combines a temporally aware ST-transformer VQ-VAE tokenizer with a learned 1,024-entry codebook, a latent action model, and masked next-frame dynamics. It uses iterative MaskGIT decoding within frames, not ordinary raster next-token generation, and evaluates fidelity, controllability, and policy learning rather than experience alone. Action-unlabeled video broadens possible training data, subject to selection, licensing, quality, and domain constraints; earlier observation-only predictive models already existed. Oasis instead uses a spatial autoencoder and latent diffusion to generate successive frames, reporting 20 frames per second on its specified hardware. Neither result validates a single shared discrete next-token mechanism or guarantees long-term object permanence.
Shared sequence processing is one route toward larger multimodal systems. Chameleon demonstrates discrete text/image early fusion; Gato combines continuous image embeddings with scalar tokens for policy outputs. Shared processing still permits modality-specific tokenizers, masks, and heads. It does not imply one scaling curve across modalities or general superiority over specialized components. Part IX develops these comparisons.