Probability Basics › Limitations and Considerations

Michael BrenndoerferUpdated December 25, 20252 min read
Machine Learning from ScratchAll chapters
Part 1 of 9Statistics 101
Chapter 3Probability Basics › Limitations and Considerations
Reading section 10 of 12 · Limitations and Considerations · 2 minSection 10 of 12 · 2 min

Book contents

Section 10 of 12 · 2 min read

Probability Basics › Limitations and ConsiderationsOne section · Sections in this chapter10 / 12 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links

Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.

Article links

Make inline references clickable

While probability theory provides powerful tools for reasoning under uncertainty, it depends on assumptions that may not always hold in practice. The concept of independence, which greatly simplifies probability calculations, rarely holds perfectly in real-world data. Financial returns exhibit dependence over time, survey responses from the same household are correlated, and measurements on the same individual are dependent. Ignoring such dependencies can lead to severe underestimation of uncertainty and overconfident conclusions.

The assignment of probabilities itself raises challenges. In frequentist interpretations, probabilities represent long-run frequencies of repeatable events, but many real-world situations involve unique, non-repeatable events where frequency interpretations don't apply naturally. How do we assign probabilities to one-time events like "this startup will succeed" or "this patient will respond to treatment"? Bayesian approaches offer an alternative interpretation of probability as degree of belief, but this requires specifying prior distributions that may be subjective or difficult to elicit.

The theoretical results we've discussed, particularly the Law of Large Numbers and Central Limit Theorem, require assumptions that need consideration. These theorems assume independence and identically distributed observations, finite variance, and often require sample sizes larger than those available in practice. Real data frequently violate these assumptions through dependence structures, heavy-tailed distributions, or small samples. While the theorems often provide reasonable approximations even when assumptions are mildly violated, we must use judgment in assessing whether asymptotic results apply to our finite-sample situations.

Finally, probability models are always simplifications of reality. The map is not the territory. A probability distribution is a mathematical abstraction that captures certain features of a phenomenon while ignoring others. A normal distribution might adequately describe the center and spread of a dataset while missing important skewness or tail behavior. A Poisson process might model average arrival rates while ignoring time-of-day effects. Good statistical practice requires applying probability models thoughtfully, assessing model fit, checking assumptions, and understanding the limitations of the chosen probabilistic framework.