Derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE › Applying the No-Arbitrage Principle

Michael BrenndoerferNovember 26, 20252 min read
Quantitative FinanceAll chapters
Part 5 of 15Stochastic Calculus and Pricing Theory
Chapter 29Derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE › Applying the No-Arbitrage Principle
Reading section 5 of 16 · Applying the No-Arbitrage Principle · 2 minSection 5 of 16 · 2 min

Book contents

Section 5 of 16 · 2 min read

Derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE › Applying the No-Arbitrage PrincipleOne section · Sections in this chapter5 / 16 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links

Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.

Article links

Make inline references clickable

We now have a portfolio with no risk over the next instant. Building on the no-arbitrage principle from our previous chapter on risk-neutral valuation, a riskless portfolio must earn the risk-free rate. The logic is ironclad: if the portfolio earned more than the risk-free rate, you could borrow money at the risk-free rate, invest in the portfolio, and pocket the difference as guaranteed profit. If it earned less, you could short the portfolio, invest the proceeds in the risk-free asset, and again earn guaranteed profit. Either scenario represents arbitrage, a free lunch that cannot persist in a well-functioning market.

The no-arbitrage condition states:

dΠ=rΠ dtd\Pi = r \Pi \, dt

where:

  • rr: risk-free interest rate
  • Π\Pi: value of the riskless portfolio
  • dtdt: time increment

This equation simply says that the return on a riskless investment must equal the risk-free rate. The risk-free rate rr represents the return you could earn on a perfectly safe investment, such as a government bond or a bank deposit.

Now we substitute our expressions for dΠd\Pi and Π\Pi and perform algebraic manipulations to extract the PDE:

(∂V∂t+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2)dt=r(V−∂V∂SS)dt∂V∂t+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2=rV−rS∂V∂S(divide by dt)∂V∂t+rS∂V∂S+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2−rV=0(group terms)\begin{aligned} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2} \right) dt &= r \left( V - \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} S \right) dt \\ \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2} &= rV - rS\frac{\partial V}{\partial S} && \text{(divide by } dt \text{)} \\ \frac{\partial V}{\partial t} + rS\frac{\partial V}{\partial S} + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial S^2} - rV &= 0 && \text{(group terms)} \end{aligned}

where:

  • VV: derivative price
  • tt: time
  • SS: stock price
  • rr: risk-free rate
  • σ\sigma: volatility

This is the Black-Scholes-Merton partial differential equation. We have arrived at a fundamental constraint that any arbitrage-free derivative price must satisfy. The equation emerged from combining three key ingredients: the assumption that stock prices follow geometric Brownian motion, the application of Itô's lemma to characterize derivative dynamics, and the no-arbitrage condition that riskless portfolios must earn the risk-free rate.