Derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE › Applying the No-Arbitrage Principle
Quantitative FinanceAll chapters Derivation of the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE › Applying the No-Arbitrage PrincipleOne section · Sections in this chapter5 / 16 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links
Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.
Article links
Make inline references clickable
We now have a portfolio with no risk over the next instant. Building on the no-arbitrage principle from our previous chapter on risk-neutral valuation, a riskless portfolio must earn the risk-free rate. The logic is ironclad: if the portfolio earned more than the risk-free rate, you could borrow money at the risk-free rate, invest in the portfolio, and pocket the difference as guaranteed profit. If it earned less, you could short the portfolio, invest the proceeds in the risk-free asset, and again earn guaranteed profit. Either scenario represents arbitrage, a free lunch that cannot persist in a well-functioning market.
The no-arbitrage condition states:
where:
- : risk-free interest rate
- : value of the riskless portfolio
- : time increment
This equation simply says that the return on a riskless investment must equal the risk-free rate. The risk-free rate represents the return you could earn on a perfectly safe investment, such as a government bond or a bank deposit.
Now we substitute our expressions for and and perform algebraic manipulations to extract the PDE:
where:
- : derivative price
- : time
- : stock price
- : risk-free rate
- : volatility
This is the Black-Scholes-Merton partial differential equation. We have arrived at a fundamental constraint that any arbitrage-free derivative price must satisfy. The equation emerged from combining three key ingredients: the assumption that stock prices follow geometric Brownian motion, the application of Itô's lemma to characterize derivative dynamics, and the no-arbitrage condition that riskless portfolios must earn the risk-free rate.