Counterparty Risk and CVA › CVA Sensitivity Analysis
Quantitative FinanceAll chapters Counterparty Risk and CVA › CVA Sensitivity AnalysisOne section · Sections in this chapter8 / 16 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links
Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.
Article links
Make inline references clickable
CVA is sensitive to three main drivers: credit quality (CDS spread), exposure profile (driven by market parameters), and recovery assumptions. Understanding these sensitivities is essential for risk management because they tell us which factors matter most for a given position and how CVA might change as market conditions evolve.
import numpy as np
# Sensitivity to CDS spread
cds_spreads = np.linspace(0.005, 0.05, 20) # 50 to 500 bps
cvas_by_spread = []
for spread in cds_spreads:
mpd, _ = calculate_default_probabilities(spread, recovery_rate, times)
cva_temp = calculate_cva(expected_exposure, mpd, discount_factors, lgd)
cvas_by_spread.append(cva_temp)
# Sensitivity to recovery rate
recovery_rates = np.linspace(0.2, 0.6, 20)
cvas_by_recovery = []
for rec in recovery_rates:
lgd_temp = 1 - rec
mpd, _ = calculate_default_probabilities(cds_spread, rec, times)
cva_temp = calculate_cva(expected_exposure, mpd, discount_factors, lgd_temp)
cvas_by_recovery.append(cva_temp)

The near-linear relationship between CVA and CDS spread reflects the first-order approximation in the CVA formula. Since default probability is approximately proportional to the hazard rate, and the hazard rate is proportional to the CDS spread, CVA increases roughly linearly with spread. This relationship is extremely useful for hedging, as it suggests that a simple CDS position can offset most of the credit spread risk in CVA.
The recovery rate sensitivity shows a less intuitive pattern: while higher recovery reduces LGD, it also implies lower hazard rates for the same CDS spread, creating offsetting effects. When recovery is high, each default is less costly (lower LGD), but the implied hazard rate from the CDS market is also higher (since the same spread must compensate for smaller expected losses per default, there must be more defaults). These two effects partially cancel, making CVA less sensitive to recovery assumptions than one might initially expect.