No-Arbitrage Principle and Risk-Neutral Valuation › Risk-Neutral Valuation in Continuous Time

Michael BrenndoerferNovember 25, 20255 min read
Quantitative FinanceAll chapters
Part 5 of 15Stochastic Calculus and Pricing Theory
Chapter 28No-Arbitrage Principle and Risk-Neutral Valuation › Risk-Neutral Valuation in Continuous Time
Reading section 8 of 12 · Risk-Neutral Valuation in Continuous Time · 5 minSection 8 of 12 · 5 min

Book contents

Section 8 of 12 · 5 min read

No-Arbitrage Principle and Risk-Neutral Valuation › Risk-Neutral Valuation in Continuous TimeOne section · Sections in this chapter8 / 12 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links

Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.

Article links

Make inline references clickable

The discrete binomial framework extends naturally to continuous time, where calculus replaces algebra and Brownian motion replaces discrete jumps. The core insight remains the same: we can change probability measures to simplify derivative pricing.

The Girsanov Theorem Connection

In continuous time, the transition from real-world to risk-neutral probabilities involves changing the drift of the Brownian motion. This change of measure, which generalizes what we did in the discrete binomial model, is accomplished through the Girsanov theorem. Under the real-world measure PP, the stock follows:

dSt=μSt dt+σSt dWtPdS_t = \mu S_t \, dt + \sigma S_t \, dW_t^P

where:

  • dStdS_t: change in stock price
  • StS_t: stock price at time tt
  • μ\mu: expected return under measure PP
  • dtdt: small time increment
  • σ\sigma: volatility
  • dWtPdW_t^P: Brownian increment under measure PP

Here the drift μ\mu reflects the stock's actual expected return, which typically exceeds the risk-free rate due to the equity risk premium.

The Girsanov theorem, a fundamental result in stochastic calculus, tells us we can change to an equivalent measure QQ under which:

dSt=rSt dt+σSt dWtQdS_t = r S_t \, dt + \sigma S_t \, dW_t^Q

where:

  • dStdS_t: change in stock price
  • rr: risk-free interest rate
  • StS_t: stock price at time tt
  • dtdt: small time increment
  • σ\sigma: volatility
  • dWtQdW_t^Q: Brownian increment under risk-neutral measure QQ

The drift changes from μ\mu to rr, but the volatility σ\sigma remains unchanged. The change of measure affects the expected return but not the magnitude of the random fluctuations. Under this risk-neutral measure, the stock earns the risk-free rate, and we can price any derivative as:

f0=e−rTEQ[fT]f_0 = e^{-rT} E^Q[f_T]

where:

  • f0f_0: price of the derivative
  • rr: risk-free interest rate
  • TT: time to expiration
  • EQ[⋅]E^Q[\cdot]: expectation under risk-neutral measure QQ
  • fTf_T: payoff at expiration

The relationship between the two Brownian motions involves the market price of risk λ=(μ−r)/σ\lambda = (\mu - r)/\sigma:

dWtQ=dWtP+λ dtdW_t^Q = dW_t^P + \lambda \, dt

where:

  • dWtQ,dWtPdW_t^Q, dW_t^P: Brownian increments under measures QQ and PP
  • λ\lambda: market price of risk
  • dtdt: small time increment

This quantity measures the excess return per unit of volatility that investors demand for bearing stock price risk. A high market price of risk indicates that investors require substantial compensation for bearing uncertainty. The Girsanov change of measure essentially absorbs this risk premium into the probability measure itself, transforming a world where risky assets earn excess returns into a world where everything earns the risk-free rate.

Out[20]:
Visualization
Five simulated stock price paths under the real-world measure with a dashed expected path rising from 100 at a 12% drift.
Stock price simulation under the Real-World Measure (P). Five paths share the same random shocks used in the risk-neutral panel, while the dashed expected path grows at the 12% real-world drift μ.
Five simulated stock price paths under the risk-neutral measure with a dashed expected path rising from 100 at a 5% drift.
Stock price simulation under the Risk-Neutral Measure (Q). With the same random shocks, the dashed expected path grows at the 5% risk-free rate r, shifting the path distribution below its real-world counterpart.

We'll explore these ideas further when we derive the Black-Scholes-Merton PDE in the next chapter, where the continuous-time hedging argument leads to the same conclusion through a different route.