Grammars and Constituency Structure › Summary

Michael BrenndoerferMay 4, 20252 min read
Language AI HandbookAll chapters
Part 7 of 67Linguistic Form: Morphology and Syntax
Chapter 46Grammars and Constituency Structure › Summary
Reading section 10 of 11 · Summary · 2 minSection 10 of 11 · 2 min

Section 10 of 11 · 2 min read

Grammars and Constituency Structure › SummarySection view · Sections in this chapter10 / 11 ↓
Reading tools Definitions, links & notes

Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.

Article links

Make inline references clickable

Notes & comments
  • Constituency is the hierarchical grouping of words into phrases. Constituents can be identified with substitution, movement, coordination, and answer tests, though those tests are diagnostics rather than proofs.
  • A context-free grammar is a tuple (N,Σ,R,S)(N, \Sigma, R, S) with rules A→αA \to \alpha. It is context-free because each rule rewrites a single nonterminal regardless of surrounding symbols.
  • A parse tree records a derivation hierarchically. Its terminal leaves are tokens, its nonterminal nodes record licensed phrase expansions, and its yield is the terminal sequence.
  • Ambiguity arises when one token sequence has multiple parse trees. Lexical category ambiguity comes from words with multiple categories. Structural ambiguity comes from different phrase groupings, such as prepositional phrase attachment.
  • CKY parsing uses dynamic programming over spans. In Chomsky Normal Form, a span is built by splitting it into two subspans and applying a binary rule. For a fixed grammar, its compact recognition chart runs in O(n3)O(n^3) time; enumerating every parse adds output-sensitive work.
  • A PCFG assigns probabilities to rules and therefore to trees. The probability of a tree is the product of its rule probabilities. The inside algorithm sums over all parses of a span.
  • CFGs capture recursion and nested constituency, including some unbounded dependencies. A particular grammar may need refined categories or feature constraints for agreement and lexical selection. Some dependency patterns motivate richer formalisms, while neural constituency parsers can supply learned structural scores.
  • Symbolic grammars specify licensed trees. A parser can recognize or enumerate these structures without ranking them. A model or contextual information can then support the choice of a preferred or intended reading.

Comments

Add to the conversation

A question, a correction, or an example from your own work.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Newsletter

Stay up to date

Get new articles, book updates, and notes on AI and technology.

Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy policy