BART Pre-training › BART Pre-training

Michael BrenndoerferOctober 19, 20251 min read
Language AI HandbookAll chapters
Part 25 of 67Encoder-Decoder Models
Chapter 181BART Pre-training › BART Pre-training
Reading section 1 of 16 · BART Pre-training · 1 minSection 1 of 16 · 1 min

Book contents

Section 1 of 16 · 1 min read

BART Pre-training › BART Pre-trainingOne section · Sections in this chapter1 / 16 ↓
Reading tools Definitions & inline links

Choose your expertise level to adjust how many terms are explained. Beginners see more tooltips, experts see fewer to maintain reading flow. Hover over underlined terms for instant definitions.

Article links

Make inline references clickable

In the previous chapter, we explored BART's bidirectional encoder and autoregressive decoder architecture. Now we turn to what makes BART distinctive: its pre-training strategy. While BERT uses masked language modeling and GPT uses causal language modeling, BART takes a fundamentally different approach by framing pre-training as denoising autoencoding. The model learns to reconstruct original text from deliberately corrupted inputs, and the specific corruption schemes determine what linguistic knowledge BART acquires.

What makes BART's approach powerful is its flexibility. Rather than committing to a single corruption strategy, the researchers experimented with five different noising functions and their combinations. Each corruption type forces the model to learn different aspects of language, from local token patterns to document-level structure. This chapter examines each noising scheme in detail, explores why certain combinations work better than others, and implements the key corruption functions.